2007 Mazda 5 vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 5 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano. 2007 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda 5 | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | 5 | Nano |
Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |