2007 Mazda 5 vs. 2013 Ford F-150

To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 5. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 5.

Because 2013 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford F-150 (377 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Mazda 5 2013 Ford F-150
Make Mazda Ford
Model 5 F-150
Year Released 2007 2013
Body Type Minivan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 298 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 201 Nm 377 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 6 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 5415 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 2624 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1900 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.1 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 12.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 98 L