2007 Mazda 6 vs. 1950 Rover P4
To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1950 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Rover P4.
Because 1950 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 6 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Rover P4. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda 6 | 1950 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | P4 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 7.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 52 L |