2007 Mazda 6 vs. 1958 Simca Vedette

To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Simca Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Simca Vedette would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Simca Vedette weights approximately 284 kg more than 2007 Mazda 6.

Because 1958 Simca Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Simca Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Mazda 6 1958 Simca Vedette
Make Mazda Simca
Model 6 Vedette
Year Released 2007 1958
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2968 cc 1290 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 212 HP 0 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 816 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2700 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]