2007 Mazda 6 vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1958 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1958 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 794 kg more than 2007 Mazda 6.
Because 1958 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1958 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1958 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda 6 | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | 6 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |