2007 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 379 kg more than 2007 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 6 (267 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda 6 | 1994 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | Tempo |
Year Released | 2007 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 267 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |