2007 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 6. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 6.
Because 2000 Vector RD 180 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Vector RD 180. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 6 (181 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda 6 | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | Mazda | Vector |
Model | 6 | RD 180 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2390 mm |