2007 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mazda 6 weights approximately 376 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda 6 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Westfield |
Model | 6 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |