2007 Mazda 6 vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2007 Mazda 6 and 2007 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2007). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 76 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 6. (164 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 6.
Because 2007 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda 6. (207 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda 6 | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
