2007 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Holden Calais

To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 144 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 6. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 6.

Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda 6. (310 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda 6. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2007 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2007 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: