2007 Mazda B3000 vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2007 Mazda B3000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda B3000 (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (115 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda B3000 | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | B3000 | TF |
Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2969 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |