2007 Mazda B3000 vs. 2009 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,799 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan GT-R (481 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 2007 Mazda B3000. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan GT-R (583 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda B3000 | 2009 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | B3000 | GT-R |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2969 cc | 3799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 481 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 583 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 74 L |