2007 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XK (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2007 Mazda B3000. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XK (515 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda B3000. 2010 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2007 Mazda B3000 has manual transmission. 2007 Mazda B3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | B3000 | XK |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2969 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1328 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 61 L |