2007 Mazda B3000 vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda B3000 (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda B3000 | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | B3000 | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2969 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2085 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1623 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 51 L |
