2007 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-7 | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | CX-7 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1976 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 351 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |