2007 Mazda CX-7 vs. 2013 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-7 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Cube. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-7 | 2013 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CX-7 | Cube |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 351 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |