2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | CX-9 | Baby |
Year Released | 2007 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3130 mm |