2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1957 Seat 600
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 231 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600.
Because 1957 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1957 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | CX-9 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 19 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |
