2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. (110 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. (189 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CX-9 | SC |
Year Released | 2007 | 1959 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 189 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |