2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1962 Morgan 4

To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4.

Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Mazda CX-9 1962 Morgan 4
Make Mazda Morgan
Model CX-9 4
Year Released 2007 1962
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3496 cc 1340 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 263 HP 55 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 3670 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1430 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2450 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]