2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1962 Morris Minor
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morris Minor would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 214 more horse power than 1962 Morris Minor. (36 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1962 Morris Minor.
Because 1962 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Morris Minor. (68 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1962 Morris Minor | |
Make | Mazda | Morris |
Model | CX-9 | Minor |
Year Released | 2007 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 36 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 68 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2190 mm |