2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | CX-9 | Herald |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 29 L |