2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | CX-9 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |
