2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1965 Trabant Universal
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1965 Trabant Universal. (23 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1965 Trabant Universal.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Trabant Universal. (51 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Trabant Universal.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1965 Trabant Universal | |
Make | Mazda | Trabant |
Model | CX-9 | Universal |
Year Released | 2007 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 23 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 51 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2030 mm |