2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1967 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 1300. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1967 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | CX-9 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 99 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2460 mm |