2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-4.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1973 Mazda RX-4 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | CX-9 | RX-4 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1973 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2520 mm |