2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (104 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | CX-9 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4093 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2850 mm |
