2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1977 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1977 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1977 Datsun 260Z.
Because 1977 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1977 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Mazda | Datsun |
Model | CX-9 | 260Z |
Year Released | 2007 | 1977 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4135 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |