2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | CX-9 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 5798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |
