2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1981 Honda Accord
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Honda Accord would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1981 Honda Accord. (79 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Honda Accord.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Honda Accord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Honda Accord. (126 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1981 Honda Accord | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | CX-9 | Accord |
Year Released | 2007 | 1981 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 50 L |