2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | CX-9 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2420 mm |
