2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1984 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | CX-9 | Omega |
Year Released | 2007 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |