2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1984 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1984 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault Rodeo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault Rodeo. (72 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1984 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | CX-9 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2007 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 34 L |