2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (185 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | CX-9 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2007 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 87 L |