2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2001 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2001 Seat Inca Kombi has manual transmission. 2001 Seat Inca Kombi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2001 Seat Inca Kombi | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | CX-9 | Inca Kombi |
Year Released | 2007 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1391 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |