2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2002 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Meriva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Meriva would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2002 Opel Meriva. (74 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Meriva.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Meriva. (220 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2002 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | CX-9 | Meriva |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1686 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 53 L |