2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2002 Saturn SC
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Saturn SC would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2002 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Saturn SC.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Saturn SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Saturn SC. (154 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2002 Saturn SC | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | CX-9 | SC |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |