2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Mazda CX-9 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Mazda Jeep
Model CX-9 Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2007 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3496 cc 3960 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 264 HP 195 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 312 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2700 mm