2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2006 Tata Indica
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Tata Indica would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 165 more horse power than 2006 Tata Indica. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2006 Tata Indica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Tata Indica. (115 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Tata Indica. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2006 Tata Indica has manual transmission. 2006 Tata Indica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2006 Tata Indica | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | CX-9 | Indica |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 115 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2410 mm |