2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2010 Nissan Livina is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Livina. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Livina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Livina. (154 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Livina. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan Livina has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan Livina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CX-9 | Livina |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 154 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |