2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2010 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Fluence.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2010 Renault Fluence has manual transmission. 2010 Renault Fluence will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | CX-9 | Fluence |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 110 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2702 mm |
