2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2012 Renault Espace
To start off, 2012 Renault Espace is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Renault Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2012 Renault Espace. (239 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Espace.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Espace. (330 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Espace.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2012 Renault Espace | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | CX-9 | Espace |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 83 L |