2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2013 Infiniti JX
To start off, 2013 Infiniti JX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Infiniti JX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2013 Infiniti JX. (261 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2013 Infiniti JX.
Because 2013 Infiniti JX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Infiniti JX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Infiniti JX. (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Infiniti JX.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2013 Infiniti JX | |
Make | Mazda | Infiniti |
Model | CX-9 | JX |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4989 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1722 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2901 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |