2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 100 L |