2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2013 Volvo X670. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo X670.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo X670. (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo X670.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CX-9 | X670 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |