2007 Mazda MazdaSpeed3 vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda MazdaSpeed3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda MazdaSpeed3 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda MazdaSpeed3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda MazdaSpeed3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda MazdaSpeed3 | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | MazdaSpeed3 | Cooper |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |