2007 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1972 Rover 3.5

To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1972 Rover 3.5. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 3.5.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 3.5 (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1972 Rover 3.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8. 1972 Rover 3.5 has automatic transmission and 2007 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2007 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rover 3.5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Mazda RX-8 1972 Rover 3.5
Make Mazda Rover
Model RX-8 3.5
Year Released 2007 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1308 cc 3532 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 232 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 8500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 276 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 2600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 73 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 71.1 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2820 mm