2007 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda RX-8 | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-8 | 200 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |