2007 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 162 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda RX-8 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | RX-8 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1810 mm |