2007 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Renault Twingo
To start off, 2010 Renault Twingo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Twingo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2010 Renault Twingo. (133 HP @ 6750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Twingo.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Twingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Twingo. (160 Nm @ 440 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Twingo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Renault Twingo | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-8 | Twingo |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 440 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 40 L |